Table 22. Summary of chum salmon carcasses examined for hatchery marks in selected Hood Canal streams in 1995 and 1996 (WDFW 1996, USFWS 1996).
| Stream | Estimated escapement | Fish examined | Number of marked fish observed | Maximum number of marked fish possiblea | Hypothetical maximum number of hatchery fish possibleb |
| 1995 | |||||
| Quilcene Bayc | 499 | 41 | |||
| Big Quilcene R. | 808 | 26 | |||
| L. Quilcene R. | 8 | 0 | |||
| Dosewallips | 180 | 0 | |||
| 1996 | |||||
| Quilcene Bayd | 822 | 85 | |||
| Big Quilcene R. | 642 | 55 | |||
| L. Quilcene R. | 274 | 125 | 0 | 5 | 45 |
| Dosewallips R. | 7,959 | 1,330 | 0 | 17 | 153 |
| Duckabush R. | 2,807 | 650 | 0 | 12 | 108 |
| Hamma Hamma R. | 820 | 200 | 0 | 11 | 99 |
| Union R. | 552 | 150 | 0 | 10 | 90 |
| Totalb | 12,412 | 2,455 | 0 | 14 | 126 |
aThe maximum number of marked fish that could have been in the population and still have at least a 5% chance of observing no marked fish.
bThe value in the previous column expanded to include unmarked hatchery fish based on USFWS estimate of effective tagging rate. As discussed in text, this undoubtedly overestimates the number of hatchery fish, but by an unknown amount.
cQuilcene Bay number includes fish that returned to the hatchery.
dTotal does not include fish from the fishery or from Quilcene Bay.